Cognitive therapy versus fluoxetine in the treatment of dysthymic disorder

Depression ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
David L. Dunner ◽  
Karen B. Schmaling ◽  
Helen Hendrickson ◽  
Joseph Becker ◽  
Adam Lehman ◽  
...  
1991 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 369-372 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ariel Stravynski ◽  
Anton Shahar ◽  
Richard Verreault

Six patients meeting DSM-III criteria for dysthymic disorder completed fifteen weekly sessions of one hour of individual cognitive therapy. Pre-, post- and six months follow-up assessments were carried out by an independent assessor. A significant improvement in depression was observed after treatment and maintained at six months follow-up. Clinically, improvements were meaningful and wide ranging and four of the patients no longer met DSM-III criteria for dysthymic disorders. Cognitive treatment acted specifically as it reduced significantly the frequency of negative automatic thoughts during treatment and follow-up.


Author(s):  
Mark Gilson ◽  
Arthur Freeman ◽  
M. Jane Yates ◽  
Sharon Morgillo Freeman

Chapter 1 presents general information about depression and this cognitive therapy program to treat depression. This includes a background on the program methodology and cognitive therapy (CT), what depression is (as well as major depressive disorder, dysthymic disorder, adjustment disorder with depressed mood, bipolar disorder), how to identify symptoms of depression, thoughts of self-harm and suicidal thoughts.


1993 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 105-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan W. Stewart ◽  
Mary Ann Mercier ◽  
Frederic M. Quitkin ◽  
Patrick J. McGrath ◽  
Edward Nunes ◽  
...  

Thirty-nine depressed outpatients meeting DSM-III criteria for nonmelancholic major depression or dysthymic disorder were treated with 16 weekly individual cognitive therapy sessions. Prior to treatment, they completed the Beck Depression Inventory, the Hopelessness Scale, and the Dysfunctional Attitudes Scale. Independent of knowledge of outcome, the authors chose from these scales items indicating demoralization, that is, that patients perceived their ability to positively affect their own future as too likely to be ineffectual to warrant efforts at change. After cognitive therapy, 20 patients were considered responders (51%) although three quickly relapsed (44% responded and maintained). Nonresponders had significantly higher pretreatment demoralization scores than did responders. These results suggest that high levels of demoralization may predict poor response of depression to cognitive therapy, although the small sample size precluded differentiation of demoralization from hopelessness.


ASHA Leader ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 3-14
Author(s):  
Mark Kander
Keyword(s):  

ASHA Leader ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 22 (10) ◽  
pp. 22-24
Author(s):  
Neela Swanson
Keyword(s):  

2014 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 233-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Heidenreich ◽  
Christoph Grober ◽  
Johannes Michalak

Unter den im Zentrum dieses Sonderhefts stehenden Neuentwicklungen nehmen achtsamkeitsbasierte Verfahren eine bedeutsame Rolle ein: Während die „Achtsamkeitsbasierte Stressreduktion” (mindfulness-based stress reduction, MBSR) bereits in der zweiten Hälfte der 1970er Jahre entwickelt wurde ( Kabat-Zinn, 1990 ), erlangte insbesondere die von Segal, Williams und Teasdale (2002) speziell für die Rückfallprävention bei rezidivierender depressiver Störung entwickelte „Achtsamkeitsbasierte Kognitive Therapie” (mindfulness-based cognitive therapy, MBCT) eine zunehmende Bedeutung im Bereich kognitiv-behavioraler Ansätze. Der vorliegende Beitrag geht zunächst auf den historischen und theoretischen Hintergrund der Achtsamkeitsbasierten Kognitiven Therapie ein. Im Anschluss daran wird die praktische Umsetzung des Gruppenkonzepts vorgestellt und der Stand der Forschung anhand aktueller Metaanalysen referiert. Der Beitrag schließt mit einer kritischen Diskussion einer allzu verkürzten Anwendung von Achtsamkeit in der klinischen Praxis.


Crisis ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (6) ◽  
pp. 451-460 ◽  
Author(s):  
Megan S. Chesin ◽  
Beth S. Brodsky ◽  
Brandon Beeler ◽  
Christopher A. Benjamin-Phillips ◽  
Ida Taghavi ◽  
...  

Abstract. Background: Few investigations of patient perceptions of suicide prevention interventions exist, limiting our understanding of the processes and components of treatment that may be engaging and effective for high suicide-risk patients. Aims: Building on promising quantitative data that showed that adjunct mindfulness-based cognitive therapy to prevent suicidal behavior (MBCT-S) reduced suicidal thinking and depression among high suicide-risk patients, we subjected MBCT-S to qualitative inspection by patient participants. Method: Data were provided by 15 patients who completed MBCT-S during a focus group and/or via a survey. Qualitative data were coded using thematic analysis. Themes were summarized using descriptive analysis. Results: Most patients viewed the intervention as acceptable and feasible. Patients attributed MBCT-S treatment engagement and clinical improvement to improved emotion regulation. A minority of patients indicated that factors related to the group treatment modality were helpful. A small percentage of patients found that aspects of the treatment increased emotional distress and triggered suicidal thinking. These experiences, however, were described as fleeting and were not linked to suicidal behavior. Limitations: The sample size was small. Conclusion: Information gathered from this study may assist in refining MBCT-S and treatments to prevent suicidal behavior among high suicide-risk patients generally.


2002 ◽  
Vol 47 (5) ◽  
pp. 534-535
Author(s):  
Lynn P. Rehm
Keyword(s):  

1995 ◽  
Vol 40 (7) ◽  
pp. 695-695
Author(s):  
R. C. Prather

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document